The idiocy continues. Just registered another client, Mr FW, who has worked continuously since 1963. He has diabetes and can't walk very far. He is 9 months off retirement. After having a period of 12 months on the sick due to his disabilities, he has been declared fit for work and is expected to apply for 6 jobs a week, and look for jobs within a 90 mile radius.
Our town is surrounded on 3 sides by the sea. Is he supposed to go for a job in the Irish Sea?? He is another victim of the glorious box-ticking exercise the DWP/JobCentre Plus has become. There is absolutely no way this man would ever be offered a job, because of his age and his ill health. It is an example of the abject futility of Iain Duncan Smith's Benefit Reforms. I'd love for someone like IDS or Cameron to spend a day in here, seeing what people have to go through, and to see how organisations such as us, who are pinched to the limit with funding cuts, are expected to take up the slack from Government funded organisations.
Its going to be a long day.
Another World
Thursday, 20 March 2014
Thursday, 6 March 2014
Claimant Commitment or Signing Your Own Death Warrant
The Government's new Claimant Commitment is being rolled out up here, and we are just seeing the first ramifications of this further change to Welfare policy. The Claimant Commitment is the Coalition Government's answer to the Job Seekers Agreement, something you have to sign up to when you make a new claim.
Esther McVey (is she the worlds only Tory Scouser??) says:
"The Claimant Commitment marks the start of a redefinition of the relationship between the welfare state and claimants. In return for state support, we expect claimants to do all they can to meet their responsibilities to return to work. It also strengthens the ability of Job Centre Plus staff to support claimants back in to work at the earliest opportunity. Work coaches and job seekers will agree to regular specific tasks and training opportunities and the penalties claimants could face for failing to meet their responsibilities to get in to work will be clearly spelt out"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/jobseekers-to-start-signing-new-claimant-commitment-today
I have no idea how, in practice, the new Claimant Commitment helps Job Centre staff to support claimants back in to work at the earliest opportunity. Its just a soundbite to try and make her appear credible.
Just imagine that you have been on some form of disability benefit for the last 15/20 years, you fail your ATOS assessment and your appeal and are put on to Job Seekers Allowance, and you are asked to complete a Claimant Commitment. This "Commitment" spells out what you are going to do to look for work. How do you know where to start? How do you know what you are capable of? Once you sign on the dotted line, that's it, if you don't fulfill your obligations as per the Client Commitment, you can be sanctioned. Once again, its just a massive buck-passing exercise by the Government.
And again, its agencies like ours that will pick up the fallout from these Governmental policies. We already have people coming to see us who say "I need to do a 30 hour job search, can I block book your computer?" We have one PC.
"The Claimant Commitment marks the start of a redefinition of the relationship between the welfare state and claimants. In return for state support, we expect claimants to do all they can to meet their responsibilities to return to work. It also strengthens the ability of Job Centre Plus staff to support claimants back in to work at the earliest opportunity. Work coaches and job seekers will agree to regular specific tasks and training opportunities and the penalties claimants could face for failing to meet their responsibilities to get in to work will be clearly spelt out"
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/jobseekers-to-start-signing-new-claimant-commitment-today
I have no idea how, in practice, the new Claimant Commitment helps Job Centre staff to support claimants back in to work at the earliest opportunity. Its just a soundbite to try and make her appear credible.
Just imagine that you have been on some form of disability benefit for the last 15/20 years, you fail your ATOS assessment and your appeal and are put on to Job Seekers Allowance, and you are asked to complete a Claimant Commitment. This "Commitment" spells out what you are going to do to look for work. How do you know where to start? How do you know what you are capable of? Once you sign on the dotted line, that's it, if you don't fulfill your obligations as per the Client Commitment, you can be sanctioned. Once again, its just a massive buck-passing exercise by the Government.
And again, its agencies like ours that will pick up the fallout from these Governmental policies. We already have people coming to see us who say "I need to do a 30 hour job search, can I block book your computer?" We have one PC.
Tuesday, 4 March 2014
Not Laughing
Tuesday 4th March
I rang the Outreach Centre today
to speak to one of my colleagues, just to let her know about a conversation I’d
had with a client earlier.
We discuss various things, then
she tells me, (rather indignantly) that she registered a client this morning
who had been referred to us from another provider (one who has a contract to
deliver the Work Programme), and the reason that the client was referred to us
is that the Work Programme provider (allegedly) told the client that they are
unable to write a CV for him. They do not have the capacity/ability to do this,
and the Outreach Centre is the best place to get CV’s done.
I am astounded. An organisation who is given Government
funding to help people back to work, is signposting its clients to us, to receive
assistance with writing a CV?? I’ve been
trying to get my head ‘round that one all morning… I would laugh at the absurdity of
the situation, if there wasn't someone at the end of all this buck-passing
trying to fulfil their Client Commitment, or Job Seekers Agreement, or whatever
Government have decided to label it now.
9th January: Lets Play Pass The Parcel
9th January
A client came to see me today, to
register for help with writing a CV, and was referred by Job Centre Plus. We
will call him Client S. This is getting
to be a recurring story: Client S has been on Incapacity Benefit for nearly 20
years and after failing his ATOS medical and also failing his appeal, he has
now been moved on to Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) and is expected to do 30 hours
a week job searching. Here’s the crunch:
he has severe photosensitive epilepsy, a condition so bad that I had to
interview him in a darkened room.
From an employers’ viewpoint, who
is going to employ this man? He can’t work inside because of his medical
condition, so unless some kindly employer decides to re-fit all the lighting in
their workplace, he isn’t going to get a nice job sitting at a nice desk.
Outside would be even more problematical. Imagine if he had a seizure and hit
his head? Can you imagine the Employers Liability insurance to cover this? Have
the Government never heard of Corporate Manslaughter?? It beggars belief…
We have neither the capacity nor
the facilities to deal with clients with complex medical issues, and yet the
DWP are signposting people like Client S to organisations such as us, to
deliver one-to-one support. How are we supposed to write CV’s for people who
have not worked for 20-odd years, and have a patchy recollection of their employment
history prior to their illness? Do the DWP expect us to be able to assist the
client with their 30 hour Job Search? The ultimate end of these governmental
welfare reforms is passing the buck, passing people from one agency to another
so they can tick the box and discount the client from their figures.
I have started keeping a log of the number of
people that are being referred to us that have previously been on long term
Disability/Incapacity benefits. There
will be a prize for the advisor who has the client that has been out of work
for the longest length of time. Not.
Monday, 6 January 2014
It's Another World Out There...
We'll Start At The Beginning
I have been working in this job for 18 months, as a manager for an Employment Support project, and during those long 18 months, I have seen things go from bad to worse for those people who are unfortunate enough to be out of work.
I have been working in this job for 18 months, as a manager for an Employment Support project, and during those long 18 months, I have seen things go from bad to worse for those people who are unfortunate enough to be out of work.
I am sick and tired of reading
about benefit scroungers and unemployed and disabled people in the mass media,
which aims to vilify and victimise the most vulnerable members of society and
portray them as lazy, workshy scroungers who take the food out of the mouths of
"honest, hard-working tax payers".
Being in a position to see this first-hand, I thought I would write a
blog (anonymously of course, to protect the identities of the people I work
with and to stop me from being sacked!) so that people can see exactly what
goes on, and what people’s lives are like.
A real picture, not some half-baked made-up piece in a Tory tabloid rag,
whose only aim is to divide and conquer, and take the eyes of the populace off
what is really going on.
Stories about unemployment and
benefits polarise opinion, people in receipt of benefits are either “scroungers”
or “vulnerable” and whilst I have learnt that the two are not necessarily
mutually exclusive, it is always right to bear in mind that at the bottom of it
all, these people are human beings, and as such are inclined to greed, folly
and stupidity as well as generosity, prudence and good sense as much as the
rest of humanity.
About Me
I am a woman in my
mid-forties, and have worked in an educational/employment capacity for some
years, so I didn’t think that I would find this job such an eye-opener as it
has been; I’d worked in Customer Service for several years previously, so there’s
not a lot that surprises me when dealing with people.
My background is working-class, I
was bought up in a council house, part of a large family that survived on
benefits, so I didn’t come in to this role from some idealistic, middle-class
liberal position; I generally take the view of “There but for the Grace of God
Go I…” I was lucky enough to be intelligent(ish) and fairly articulate, so I
went to University; not everyone has the same aspirations or access to the same
options, and sadly, as you begin to realise after a while, some people are
pretty much destined to fail from the start.
The Job
I manage an outreach centre for
unemployed people in a large town in the North-West of England. We aim to provide help and support to those
people who are seeking work, by helping them write CV’s and covering letters,
we also have facilities such as PC’s which our clients use for job searches/job
applications. Town B, where we are situated, has high levels of unemployment,
especially amongst 16 -24 year olds, and massive levels of people in receipt of
sickness benefit (or what is left of sickness benefit). Child poverty is high, and the town overall
is ranked in the Top 20 most deprived towns in England. That’s one chart rundown you won’t be hearing
of a Sunday afternoon…
The unemployment picture is
somewhat skewed as we have two very large employers in Town B, who employ
people with very specific skills, and thus command high wages. At the bottom end, however, are huge swathes
of the population who have very limited, or no skills, and as such, are unable
to secure the type of jobs that demand a very specific skill set. These people made up the majority of our
client base.
Then along comes the Coalition
Government’s Welfare Reforms in their catchily entitled policy: Simplifying the
Welfare System and Masking Sure Work Pays. You can read it here: https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/simplifying-the-welfare-system-and-making-sure-work-pays
Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey and "Lord" Freud, a rogues gallery if I ever saw one, are the authors of this policy and the effect that it has had on people has been devastating. This is just my viewpoint, but as someone who works every day with unemployed people, I can see the consequences of the "reforms" first hand. George "Gideon" Osborne tells us that the economy is booming and unemployment is down. Up here it ain't...
Iain Duncan Smith, Esther McVey and "Lord" Freud, a rogues gallery if I ever saw one, are the authors of this policy and the effect that it has had on people has been devastating. This is just my viewpoint, but as someone who works every day with unemployed people, I can see the consequences of the "reforms" first hand. George "Gideon" Osborne tells us that the economy is booming and unemployment is down. Up here it ain't...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)